| Casino | Bonus offer | Matching bonus | U.S. friendly | Go to Download |
 | 100$ | 100% up to $100 | no | Go to Download |
 | 500$ | 100% up to $300 | no | Go to Download |
 | 300$ | 150% upto 300% | Yes | Go to Download |
 | 888$ | 100% upto $888 | Yes | Go to Download |
 | 7777$ | 100% upto 777$ | Yes | Go to Download |
Become an Online Blackjack Icon
Become an Online Blackjack Icon
There are a lot of fun games that you can play at an online casino. But since these sites have become all the rage
none have been more of a crowd pleaser than online blackjack.
Availing Casino Bonuses A Choice Not A Compulsion
This article is directed to absolute newcomers to Internet casino gambling
who have never wagered online before. It points out that just because bonuses are offered it does not mean that they should be availed. In fact it makes sense for newbie players to get accustomed to the real money wagering and the normal deposit and withdrawal processes before getting involved with bonuses. That bonuses offer certain advantages to online casino players cannot be doubted. If they did not then they would not have been around. But they come with many strings attached and it is these strings that can confuse and irritate newbie players. The first issue that needs to be resolved with bonuses is the wagering requirements. These are applicable on the welcome bonus as well. If the player avails of the welcome bonus on his first deposit at the online casino he cannot withdraw his winnings till the wagering requirements are met. The wagering requirements can be as much as 40 times the deposit and bonus. This means that it could be a while before he can get hold of his winnings. A newbie player
however
would be anxious to get hold of his first winnings as soon as possible. This was the reason why he started wagering in the first place. To be able to complete the entire transaction and get the amount in his bank would increase his confidence in the online wagering process. The sooner he gets the confidence the better for him. If the newbie player has done his homework by reading message boards and watchdog web sites then he must be aware of instances of withdrawals being disallowed because of not having met wagering requirements. This would no doubt increase his anxiety. The newbie player will have several issues on his mind
which he can resolve more easily if he does not have to simultaneously worry about bonus related issues. For example online casinos offer several variants in blackjack. The newbie player will have to figure out which gives maximum value for money. Online casinos offer several customization features such as sound options and several facilities like game statistics and gaming transaction histories. In order to get the fullest out of his online gaming experience the new player will need to figure out how best to navigate through all that is on offer. Hence it may be a good idea if he focuses on these issues and leaves the bonuses till later. The newbie player should also be aware of what he stands to lose if he does not claim the welcome bonus so that he can make a considered decision in this matter. If he does not claim the welcome bonus on his first deposit and starts wagering then that bonus is lost to him forever. He cannot claim it later. He can however claim the reload and other bonuses at a later time. It is the trend today that online casinos advertise very large welcome bonuses and this can be a temptation. But newbie players must realize that in order to avail of these large bonuses they are required to make large initial deposits
and this is something they may not want to do. Fortunately there is a way around this. A player is not committed to wagering at the same online casino all his life. He can first choose an online casino that passes the due diligence test
but is not the place he ultimately wants to play at. He can forgo the welcome bonus there and seek to achieve a comfort level with the other online casino processes. Having done that
he can enroll at an online casino with an attractive welcome bonus. He can then focus on the wagering requirements and other issues related to the bonus. Articles from Casino Advisor
Online Gambling Funds Seizure Case
Even befor
e the passing of the UIGEA the Department of Justice (DoJ) was taking steps against online gambling. The prosecutions of the owners of Neteller and PartyGaming are examples. In a move that took everybody by surprise
the DoJ under the Obama administration went much further in its efforts to curb online gambling. It seized funds meant for disbursement to online players. In June 2009
the United States District Court of Southern District of New York issued a civil seizure warrant against funds in named accounts in specified banks. The warrant was issued on the basis of an affidavit given by a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The agent averred that the funds were subject to seizure and civil forfeiture as per law. Accordingly Arlo Devlin-Brown
the assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York instructed the four banks to freeze said accounts. The accounts were in a Wells Fargo bank in San Francisco and in Alliance Bank of Arizona among others. The accounts belonged to an online payment processor. The exact reason given for the seizure was that the funds were involved in money laundering transactions and illegal gambling offenses. The total amount seized was between $30 million and $40 million. The online gaming industry was up in arms against this seizure. The online poker industry was most affected because most of the funds seized came from PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker. The Poker Players Alliance (PPA) spoke out strongly against the DoJ. It claimed that there was no legal standing for the action because the UIGEA regulations were not yet applicable and the Wire Act applied only to sports betting. Costigan Media filed a motion in the court to unseal the court records relating to the issuance of the warrant so that the legality of the action could be examined. Account Services Corporation
the payment processor whose funds had been seized
filed a motion for the return of property. While all these legal battles were playing out in the courts
the DoJ and the FBI delivered a second punch in the case. They filed an indictment charging the owner of the seized accounts with bank fraud and other offenses. The owner was Douglas Rennick who operated a number of payment processing companies such as KJB Financial Corporation
Account Services Corporation and Check Payment Financial Co. It is alleged that since 2007 Rennick has processed more than $350 million for online gambling operators. His modus operandi was as follows. He opened the accounts stating that he would be using them to issue rebate checks and for payroll processing. However
funds from offshore online gambling companies were received in the accounts and disbursed to U.S. residents withdrawing their gambling winnings. The 34 year old Rennick is a resident of Canada. He has been charged with one count each of conspiracy to commit bank fraud
conspiracy to engage in money laundering and conspiracy to operate an illegal gambling business. The punishment that Rennick faces if found guilty is a maximum of 30 years in prison and a fine of $1 million fine on the bank fraud charge
20 years in prison and a fine of $500
000 on the money laundering charge and 5 years in prison and a fine of $250
000 fine on the illegal gambling charge. Articles from Casino Advisor
Hole Card Rule Variations In Blackjack
The game of blackjack has always been played in the casinos in Europe and America. However the game has evolved differently in the casinos of different regions. Broadly three regions are can be identified with different sets of rules. Two are in the United States. These are Las Vegas and Atlantic City. The third region is Europe. Microgaming and Cryptologic offer all three versions in their online casinos. The rules in these three regions differ in a number of ways. Important points of differences are how the dealer handles a hand value of 17
rules for splitting and doubling and how the hole card is treated. In the two American variants of blackjack the dealer deals himself two c
ards
one of which is face up and the other is face down. The dealer’s face down card is called the hole card. Under certain circumstances the hole card comes into play before the players make their moves. In the European version most often the face down card is not dealt at all. Hence this version is known as a ‘no hole’ variation. At other times the hole card is dealt but never comes into play till all the players have made their moves. Hence this version is also effectively a ‘no hole’ variation. In the two American versions the no hole card comes into play if the dealer’s face up card is an ace or a ten value card. Though the Las Vegas and Atlantic City blackjack rules differ in other respects they are the same for the hole card. In case the face up card is an ace the dealer asks the players to place the insurance bet if they want to. He then checks for blackjack. If the dealer has a blackjack then the players who did not insure lose their original wagers and the players who did insure end up quits. If the dealer does not have a blackjack then the players who had insured lose their insurance wager and the players start making their moves. In case the face up card is a ten value card then the players cannot buy insurance. The dealer will check his hole card and if it is an ace then he will reveal his blackjack. All the players then lose their wagers. However if players also have a blackjack the bets push. If the dealer does not have a blackjack then the game proceeds normally. In European blackjack if the dealer’s face up card is an ace
he will ask the players if they want to insure. Then the players start making their moves in turn. If the dealer has been dealt a hole card he will turn it over after all the players are standing or bust. If the dealer has not been dealt a hole card he will deal the second card face up. The question arises what difference does the hole card or no hole card make to the player. The player may want to make additional wagers in splitting or doubling after the initial cards are dealt. In the American games the player takes this decision after the dealer checks for blackjack. If the dealer has a blackjack then the player loses immediately and will not split or double and therefore does not lose the additional amount. In European blackjack the player takes the decision to split or double without the dealer checking for blackjack. If the dealer eventually has a blackjack then the player loses the amount wagered on the split or double moves. Therefore the American variants of Las Vegas and Atlantic City offer an advantage as far as the hole card rule is concerned. Players wagering on European blackjack should be less aggressive in their split and double moves. Articles from Casino Advisor
